<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Day 4&#8211;Cold, Cold Day 4 (Spring Break 2010)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.katrinapalmer.com/2010/04/08/day-4-cold-cold-day-4-spring-break-2010/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.katrinapalmer.com/2010/04/08/day-4-cold-cold-day-4-spring-break-2010/</link>
	<description>Running On Dirt Roads</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 16:15:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kate</title>
		<link>http://www.katrinapalmer.com/2010/04/08/day-4-cold-cold-day-4-spring-break-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-911</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2010 03:12:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.katrinapalmer.com/?p=2222#comment-911</guid>
		<description>Hi It&#039;sMeAgain! Yes I know of that blog though I don&#039;t keep up on it as frequently as some others. Anyway, I took a look and spotted your comments right away.

The beginning writer just needs to read a little more and the comments will start making sense. He/She must be really beginning as in never read a how to write book. There weren&#039;t even any abbreviations. Anyway, everyone is very kind, helpful, and eager to explain everything so I think your comments were fine. That anon will be understanding soon enough if they do a little studying and keep at it.

About your first chapter comments. Yeah, you got Julie riled up. Her lists were right on and so were your comments. I liked how you detailed what made the first chapter different from the others: the END in the BEGINNING. I don&#039;t think she was focusing on why the first chapter is different from the rest of the book, but I&#039;m glad you brought it up.

Wow! When you first told me that (the END in the BEGINNING) about my writing, it was an AHA! moment. I think many of the commenters misunderstood what you meant there--not understanding the SUBTLE foreshadowing of that technique. It doesn&#039;t give away the ending AT ALL, just deepens it. OSC (Orson Scott Card) teaches that you can&#039;t even write the real opening until you know the ending. It just hit me how powerful a tool the END in the BEGINNING is. It&#039;s what makes a book re-readable!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi It&#8217;sMeAgain! Yes I know of that blog though I don&#8217;t keep up on it as frequently as some others. Anyway, I took a look and spotted your comments right away.</p>
<p>The beginning writer just needs to read a little more and the comments will start making sense. He/She must be really beginning as in never read a how to write book. There weren&#8217;t even any abbreviations. Anyway, everyone is very kind, helpful, and eager to explain everything so I think your comments were fine. That anon will be understanding soon enough if they do a little studying and keep at it.</p>
<p>About your first chapter comments. Yeah, you got Julie riled up. Her lists were right on and so were your comments. I liked how you detailed what made the first chapter different from the others: the END in the BEGINNING. I don&#8217;t think she was focusing on why the first chapter is different from the rest of the book, but I&#8217;m glad you brought it up.</p>
<p>Wow! When you first told me that (the END in the BEGINNING) about my writing, it was an AHA! moment. I think many of the commenters misunderstood what you meant there&#8211;not understanding the SUBTLE foreshadowing of that technique. It doesn&#8217;t give away the ending AT ALL, just deepens it. OSC (Orson Scott Card) teaches that you can&#8217;t even write the real opening until you know the ending. It just hit me how powerful a tool the END in the BEGINNING is. It&#8217;s what makes a book re-readable!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: itsmeagain@wheredidyougo.com</title>
		<link>http://www.katrinapalmer.com/2010/04/08/day-4-cold-cold-day-4-spring-break-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-910</link>
		<dc:creator>itsmeagain@wheredidyougo.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 20:41:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.katrinapalmer.com/?p=2222#comment-910</guid>
		<description>Hi. I just made a bunch of anonymous comments about including the End in the Beginning of the first chapter on Julie (what is her last name) post over at six lds writers and a frog. Do you know that website?

Anyway, it looks like I got her all riled up. I was wondering, what do you think of the stuff I wrote. And...can you tell which posts are mine? 

I even gave some adivce to a beginning writer who wanted us to dumb down the conversation so she could understand it. I hope I wasn&#039;t too assertive by telling her to buck up. You don&#039;t want anything dumbed down. You want it all. You want to swim in deep waters if you&#039;re going to write a deep novel.

Let me know what you think. I&#039;m a little nervous that I went OVER THE TOP. Which I really never do. I simply follow the princicples of developing a good voice for my characters and writing good novels in general, which is: be clear, be understood, don&#039;t write tentative pros, don&#039;t use apoligetic language, don&#039;t almost write well, simply write well. Don&#039;t nearly like the color green, like green. Don&#039;t sometimes enjoy chocolate milk. Love it. Or hate it. But don&#039;t sometimes it. Clarity is the mark of a professional.

I have been criticized, by those I&#039;ve never met, for some sort of odd arrogance. If these people actually knew who I was, they would likely not make that comment. What they are criticizing is my clarity. A certain amounty of CERTAINTY comes through when you write clearly. Succinctly. That isn&#039;t arrogant. That&#039;s professional. And it makes your fiction SO MUCH BETTER, to boot.

Anyway, go over there to six writers and then let me know what you think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi. I just made a bunch of anonymous comments about including the End in the Beginning of the first chapter on Julie (what is her last name) post over at six lds writers and a frog. Do you know that website?</p>
<p>Anyway, it looks like I got her all riled up. I was wondering, what do you think of the stuff I wrote. And&#8230;can you tell which posts are mine? </p>
<p>I even gave some adivce to a beginning writer who wanted us to dumb down the conversation so she could understand it. I hope I wasn&#8217;t too assertive by telling her to buck up. You don&#8217;t want anything dumbed down. You want it all. You want to swim in deep waters if you&#8217;re going to write a deep novel.</p>
<p>Let me know what you think. I&#8217;m a little nervous that I went OVER THE TOP. Which I really never do. I simply follow the princicples of developing a good voice for my characters and writing good novels in general, which is: be clear, be understood, don&#8217;t write tentative pros, don&#8217;t use apoligetic language, don&#8217;t almost write well, simply write well. Don&#8217;t nearly like the color green, like green. Don&#8217;t sometimes enjoy chocolate milk. Love it. Or hate it. But don&#8217;t sometimes it. Clarity is the mark of a professional.</p>
<p>I have been criticized, by those I&#8217;ve never met, for some sort of odd arrogance. If these people actually knew who I was, they would likely not make that comment. What they are criticizing is my clarity. A certain amounty of CERTAINTY comes through when you write clearly. Succinctly. That isn&#8217;t arrogant. That&#8217;s professional. And it makes your fiction SO MUCH BETTER, to boot.</p>
<p>Anyway, go over there to six writers and then let me know what you think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

